• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
KingSpry Logo

King, Spry, Herman, Freund & Faul, LLC.

Attorneys & Counselors

  • 610-332-0390
  • Pay My Bill (Retainer Only)
  • Pay My Bill (All Other Invoices)
  • About
    • About Us
    • Commitment to the Community
    • Firm History
    • Career Opportunities At KingSpry
    • Directions
  • Practices
    • Adoption / ART Law
    • Affordable Housing Law
    • Bankruptcy Law
    • Business Law
    • Education Law
    • Employment Law
    • Estate Planning / Administration
    • Family Law
    • Investigations and Compliance Services
    • Litigation
    • Local Taxation and Assessment
    • Municipal Law
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate Law
    • Special Education Law
  • Team
  • Greyfriars
  • News
    • News
    • Articles
  • Podcasts
    • Landmarks Podcasts
    • Legal Lunch Room Podcasts
  • Review
  • Contact

Texas Court Halts the FTC’s Non-Compete Rule

Posted on August 26th, 2024
by Avery E. Smith

On August 20, 2024, United States District Judge, Ada E. Brown of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas granted a Motion for Summary Judgement, striking down the FTC’s Non-Compete Rule.

KingSpry’s Employment Law Chair, Avery E. Smith, Esq., reviews the Court’s decision and offers guidance to employers regarding the use of non-competes and other restrictive covenants in employment practices.

Recap

On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) published its Non-Compete Rule (the “Rule”), concluding that it is an unfair method of competition for persons to, among other things, enter into non-compete clauses with workers on or after the Rule’s effective date.  The Rule was scheduled to take effect on September 4, 2024.

On July 3, 2024, in Ryan, LLC v. FTC, Judge Ada E. Brown granted a preliminary injunction against the Rule for only the Plaintiff and Plaintiff-Intervenors in that case.

In contrast, on July 23, 2024, in ATS Tree Services, LCC v. FTC, U.S. District Judge Kelley Brisbon Hodge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania upheld the Rule, denying the Plaintiff’s motion for a stay of the effective date and preliminary injunction.

The Decision

Just weeks after her July 3, 2024 decision, Judge Ada E. Brown expanded the scope of the preliminary injunction, striking down the Rule nationwide.

The Court concluded that (1) the FTC promulgated the Rule in excess of its statutory authority and (2) the Rule is arbitrary and capricious.  In composing its decision, the Court cited Loper Bright Enterprises, et al., v. Gina Raimondo, Secretary of Commerce, et al. and relevant sections of the Administrative Procedure Act.

As discussed in our previous Employment News, the Supreme Court’s decision in Loper is likely to trigger significant change in administrative law. Judge Ada E. Brown’s decision is only the first of many likely to hold that agencies lack the authority to issue regulations.

Moving Forward

Unless the FTC files a successful appeal, the Rule will not take effect on September 4, 2024 or thereafter.  As such, non-compete clauses remain enforceable at the federal level, under most circumstances. State laws, however, may limit the use of restrictive covenants.

Employers are encouraged to keep abreast of the ongoing complexities regarding the use of restrictive covenants, i.e., non-compete clauses.  While existing non-compete clauses are legal, in most cases, it may be beneficial for employers to consider the use of alternative restrictive covenants, such as non-disclosure, non-solicitation, and/or confidentiality clauses.

The Employment Law attorneys at KingSpry are a trusted resource for providing employment law advice, counsel, and representation. If your company has questions regarding non-compete clauses, KingSpry is prepared to assist you.

Primary Sidebar

Contact Us

Contacting any of the attorneys at KingSpry by e-mail or other means does not create an attorney-client relationship. Therefore, you should not send confidential information through this form or by e-mail. Unless and until you speak with one of our attorneys and an attorney-client relationship is formally established by that attorney's agreement to represent you, you should not send us confidential information. If you are not currently a client of King, Spry, Herman, Freund & Faul, LLC, your e-mail is not considered confidential.

From Our Articles

A green stylized logo with the letters "K" and "S" combined within a green square. The "K," formed by abstract shapes, is to the left while the conventional "S" on the right balances it perfectly. Ideal for your homepage branding.

Executive Order Analysis: “Transparency Regarding Foreign Influence At American Universities”

May 7, 2025

On April 23, 2025, President Donald J. Trump issued an Executive Order, “Transparency Regarding Foreign

A green stylized logo with the letters "K" and "S" combined within a green square. The "K," formed by abstract shapes, is to the left while the conventional "S" on the right balances it perfectly. Ideal for your homepage branding.

States Secure Order Restoring Federal Education Funding

May 7, 2025

On May 6, 2025, Judge Edgardo Ramos of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

Footer

King Spry White Logo

Quick Link

About KingSpry Commitment to the Community Firm History Career Opportunities at KingSpry Directions

Practice Areas

Adoption / ART Law Affordable Housing Law Bankruptcy Law Business Law Education Law Employment Law Estate Planning / Administration Family Law
Investigations and Compliance Services Litigation Local Taxation and Assessment Municipal Law Public Finance Real Estate Law Special Education Law

Contact

phone

610-332-0390

email

contact@kingspry.com

location

1 West Broad Street. Suite 700 Bethlehem, PA 18018

Facebook Youtube LinkedIn

Pay My Bill (Retainer Only) Pay My Bill (All Other Invoices)

Copyright © 2025. King Spry. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy