• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
KingSpry Logo

King, Spry, Herman, Freund & Faul, LLC.

Attorneys & Counselors

  • 610-332-0390
  • Pay My Bill (Retainer Only)
  • Pay My Bill (All Other Invoices)
  • About
    • About Us
    • Commitment to the Community
    • Firm History
    • Career Opportunities At KingSpry
    • Directions
  • Practices
    • Adoption / ART Law
    • Affordable Housing Law
    • Bankruptcy Law
    • Business Law
    • Education Law
    • Employment Law
    • Estate Planning / Administration
    • Family Law
    • Investigations and Compliance Services
    • Litigation
    • Local Taxation and Assessment
    • Municipal Law
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate Law
    • Special Education Law
  • Team
  • Greyfriars
  • News
    • News
    • Articles
  • Podcasts
    • Landmarks Podcasts
    • Legal Lunch Room Podcasts
  • Review
  • Contact

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Puts a Pin in Plans to End School Masks By December 4

Posted on November 30th, 2021
by

On November 30th, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court reinstated the school masking requirement in K-12 schools.

The ever-evolving saga of the school mask mandate in Pennsylvania took another twist as the litigation over the masking requirement continues.  

Two schoolchildren with backpacks stand indoors. The child in front wears a face mask and looks ahead, while the child in the background holds their backpack straps. Both are dressed casually and appear to be getting ready to leave.

On November 10, 2021, the Commonwealth Court entered an injunction order which voided the Acting Secretary of Health’s masking requirement throughout Pennsylvania’s schools. The Wolf Administration appealed the injunction order to the PA Supreme Court, which acted as an Automatic Stay, thereby reinstating the masking order pending appeal. 

On November 16th, the Commonwealth Court granted the Petitioners’ request that the Automatic Stay be terminated. In lifting the Automatic Stay, the Court concluded: (1) the Petitioners are likely to prevail; (2) the Petitioners will suffer irreparable injury without the injunction; and (3) the removal of the Automatic Stay will not substantially harm other interested parties or adversely affect the public interest. Termination of the Automatic Stay was set to occur on December 4th.

On November 22nd, the Wolf Administration filed an Emergency Application to reinstate the Automatic Stay. According to the Administration, the stay is needed to protect the health and lives of Pennsylvania’s school children and their families, and to prevent schools from becoming COVID-19 super-spreader sites in the run-up to the winter holiday season. The Administration also claimed that the Commonwealth Court improperly applied the law when it terminated the Automatic Stay.

In response, Petitioners focused on the underlying opinion of the Commonwealth Court that the Acting Secretary of Health lacked authority to issue the masking order. They also asserted that the Commonwealth Court correctly interpreted the law when it terminated the Automatic Stay.

The PA Supreme Court granted the Administration’s request to reinstate the Automatic Stay, noting that the stay would remain in place pending further consideration following oral argument on December 8th.

Bottom Line for Schools

As of today, the masking mandate for Pennsylvania’s schools remains in effect. While the Wolf Administration has previously stated that it expects to rescind the mandate in the middle of January, schools will need to continue to follow the moving target in the courts, and consider prior guidance from the CDC and Commonwealth until the legal issues are resolved.

School Law Bullets are a publication of KingSpry’s Education Law Practice Group. This article is meant to be informational and does not constitute legal advice.

 

 

Primary Sidebar

Contact Us

Contacting any of the attorneys at KingSpry by e-mail or other means does not create an attorney-client relationship. Therefore, you should not send confidential information through this form or by e-mail. Unless and until you speak with one of our attorneys and an attorney-client relationship is formally established by that attorney's agreement to represent you, you should not send us confidential information. If you are not currently a client of King, Spry, Herman, Freund & Faul, LLC, your e-mail is not considered confidential.

From Our Articles

A green stylized logo with the letters "K" and "S" combined within a green square. The "K," formed by abstract shapes, is to the left while the conventional "S" on the right balances it perfectly. Ideal for your homepage branding.

Executive Order Analysis: “Transparency Regarding Foreign Influence At American Universities”

May 7, 2025

On April 23, 2025, President Donald J. Trump issued an Executive Order, “Transparency Regarding Foreign

A green stylized logo with the letters "K" and "S" combined within a green square. The "K," formed by abstract shapes, is to the left while the conventional "S" on the right balances it perfectly. Ideal for your homepage branding.

States Secure Order Restoring Federal Education Funding

May 7, 2025

On May 6, 2025, Judge Edgardo Ramos of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

Footer

King Spry White Logo

Quick Link

About KingSpry Commitment to the Community Firm History Career Opportunities at KingSpry Directions

Practice Areas

Adoption / ART Law Affordable Housing Law Bankruptcy Law Business Law Education Law Employment Law Estate Planning / Administration Family Law
Investigations and Compliance Services Litigation Local Taxation and Assessment Municipal Law Public Finance Real Estate Law Special Education Law

Contact

phone

610-332-0390

email

contact@kingspry.com

location

1 West Broad Street. Suite 700 Bethlehem, PA 18018

Facebook Youtube LinkedIn

Pay My Bill (Retainer Only) Pay My Bill (All Other Invoices)

Copyright © 2025. King Spry. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy

Notifications