• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
KingSpry Logo

King, Spry, Herman, Freund & Faul, LLC.

Attorneys & Counselors

  • 610-332-0390
  • Pay My Bill (Retainer Only)
  • Pay My Bill (All Other Invoices)
  • About
    • About Us
    • Commitment to the Community
    • Firm History
    • Career Opportunities At KingSpry
    • Directions
  • Practices
    • Adoption / ART Law
    • Affordable Housing Law
    • Bankruptcy Law
    • Business Law
    • Education Law
    • Employment Law
    • Estate Planning / Administration
    • Family Law
    • Investigations and Compliance Services
    • Litigation
    • Local Taxation and Assessment
    • Municipal Law
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate Law
    • Special Education Law
  • Team
  • Greyfriars
  • News
    • News
    • Articles
  • Podcasts
    • Landmarks Podcasts
    • Legal Lunch Room Podcasts
  • Review
  • Contact

Pennsylvania Legislature Makes Changes to Residency Dispute Provisions in the School Code

Posted on July 18th, 2024
by Rebecca A. Young

On July 11th, 2024, the Pennsylvania Legislature passed House Bill 663 in both the House of Representatives and the Senate.

The bill, which seeks to update the residency dispute provisions of the Public School Code, was presented to Governor Shapiro on July 12 for his signature and is now known as Act 67 of 2024.

Section 1302 of the School Code provides all students residing within  school district the right to enroll and attend school. Residency is identified by either establishing the residence in which the student’s parent or guardian resides, or when a district resident confirms that the student resides with them full time. The law currently allows the school district to disenroll a student when it has determined that the student is not a resident.

The sponsor of Act 67, Representative Jeanne McNeill, noted that residency disputes can take weeks or more to be fully resolved, and that the law currently allows the school district to remove the student from a school while appeals and other procedures may remain pending. 

McNeill referenced a matter within her constituency in which a student with a disability was removed from school for more than 30 days. Thus, the bill would prohibit disenrollment of a student until the residency matter is fully resolved.

Act 67 provides that, in the event of a residency dispute, a school district would not be permitted to disenroll a student from school until the dispute has been fully resolved and it has been determined which school district should correctly enroll the child.

Act 67 prohibits disenrollment of a student until: 

(1) the parents or guardians have been provided an opportunity for hearing to determine residency, and any appeal has been exhausted, 

(2) after receipt of notice, the parents or guardians have declined to appeal the decision through a hearing, 

(3) the parents or guardians are provided information from the school district’s liasion for homeless children and youth regarding the educational rights of homeless students, or 

(4) a court orders a child’s disenrollment and enrollment in a different school.

The same provisions will apply if a school district determines that a district resident has falsely stated that a child resides with them.

Bottom Line for Schools

Now that the Act has been signed by the Governor, the new provisions will go into effect in 60 days. Therefore, as students enroll for the fall semester, schools must be aware that any residency disputes will be governed by the provisions of Act 67. 

Schools should use this time to address their policies and current practices pertaining to residency disputes and grievance processes.

School administrators looking to review and update their current policies should contact their school Solicitor or a member of KingSpry’s Education Law Practice Group.

Primary Sidebar

Contact Us

Contacting any of the attorneys at KingSpry by e-mail or other means does not create an attorney-client relationship. Therefore, you should not send confidential information through this form or by e-mail. Unless and until you speak with one of our attorneys and an attorney-client relationship is formally established by that attorney's agreement to represent you, you should not send us confidential information. If you are not currently a client of King, Spry, Herman, Freund & Faul, LLC, your e-mail is not considered confidential.

From Our Articles

A green stylized logo with the letters "K" and "S" combined within a green square. The "K," formed by abstract shapes, is to the left while the conventional "S" on the right balances it perfectly. Ideal for your homepage branding.

Executive Order Analysis: “Transparency Regarding Foreign Influence At American Universities”

May 7, 2025

On April 23, 2025, President Donald J. Trump issued an Executive Order, “Transparency Regarding Foreign

A green stylized logo with the letters "K" and "S" combined within a green square. The "K," formed by abstract shapes, is to the left while the conventional "S" on the right balances it perfectly. Ideal for your homepage branding.

States Secure Order Restoring Federal Education Funding

May 7, 2025

On May 6, 2025, Judge Edgardo Ramos of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

Footer

King Spry White Logo

Quick Link

About KingSpry Commitment to the Community Firm History Career Opportunities at KingSpry Directions

Practice Areas

Adoption / ART Law Affordable Housing Law Bankruptcy Law Business Law Education Law Employment Law Estate Planning / Administration Family Law
Investigations and Compliance Services Litigation Local Taxation and Assessment Municipal Law Public Finance Real Estate Law Special Education Law

Contact

phone

610-332-0390

email

contact@kingspry.com

location

1 West Broad Street. Suite 700 Bethlehem, PA 18018

Facebook Youtube LinkedIn

Pay My Bill (Retainer Only) Pay My Bill (All Other Invoices)

Copyright © 2025. King Spry. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy

Notifications