• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
KingSpry Logo

King, Spry, Herman, Freund & Faul, LLC.

Attorneys & Counselors

  • 610-332-0390
  • Pay My Bill (Retainer Only)
  • Pay My Bill (All Other Invoices)
  • About
    • About Us
    • Commitment to the Community
    • Firm History
    • Career Opportunities At KingSpry
    • Directions
  • Practices
    • Adoption / ART Law
    • Affordable Housing Law
    • Bankruptcy Law
    • Business Law
    • Education Law
    • Employment Law
    • Estate Planning / Administration
    • Family Law
    • Investigations and Compliance Services
    • Litigation
    • Local Taxation and Assessment
    • Municipal Law
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate Law
    • Special Education Law
  • Team
  • Greyfriars
  • News
    • News
    • Articles
  • Podcasts
    • Landmarks Podcasts
    • Legal Lunch Room Podcasts
  • Review
  • Contact

Guidance from the Courts on Medical Marijuana Hits a Little Closer to Home

Posted on January 2nd, 2019
by Timothy E. Gilsbach

A recent case out of Delaware may shed some additional light on what employers in Pennsylvania can expect on the issue of medical marijuana.

In the case of Chance v. Kraft Heinz Food Co., (Del. Super. Ct., Dec. 17, 2018), the court found that an employee who used medical marijuana and was fired after a positive drug test could pursue a case for wrongful discharge against his former employer.

Following the growing trend of cases nationwide, the court found that Delaware’s Medical Marijuana Act, which is similar to Pennsylvania’s, creates a private cause of action for an employee who believes that they were terminated due to their use of medical marijuana.

Delaware’s law, like Pennsylvania’s, includes an anti-discrimination provision related to employment and the court found that there would be no mechanism to enforce the law without a private cause of action – or the right of an employee to sue their former employer.

In addition, the Chance Court rejected an argument by the employer that allowing the use of medical marijuana would violate federal law and that because federal law makes the use or possession of marijuana, even for medical purposes, illegal, federal law should trump state law on this issue.

The Court explained, as other courts have, that the state’s medical marijuana law “does not require employers to participate in illegal activity … but instead merely prohibits them from discriminating based upon medical marijuana use.”

While the case is not binding on Pennsylvania Courts, many courts are more likely to accept arguments from another state when the statutes at issue are similar to one another – which in this case Pennsylvania’s and Delaware’s statutes are very similar – and when the other state is geographically closer to your state – in this case you can’t get much closer to Pennsylvania than Delaware.

As a result, employers in Pennsylvania should be careful when dealing with employees who use medical marijuana to ensure compliance with Pennsylvania’s Law and should consider reviewing possible employment actions against such employees with legal counsel.

 

 

The Eastern Pennsylvania Employment Log (EPELog) is a publication of the KingSpry Employment Law Practice Group. Jeffrey T. Tucker, Esquire, is our editor-in-chief. EPELog is meant to be informational and does not constitute legal advice.

 

Primary Sidebar

Contact Us

Contacting any of the attorneys at KingSpry by e-mail or other means does not create an attorney-client relationship. Therefore, you should not send confidential information through this form or by e-mail. Unless and until you speak with one of our attorneys and an attorney-client relationship is formally established by that attorney's agreement to represent you, you should not send us confidential information. If you are not currently a client of King, Spry, Herman, Freund & Faul, LLC, your e-mail is not considered confidential.

From Our Articles

A green stylized logo with the letters "K" and "S" combined within a green square. The "K," formed by abstract shapes, is to the left while the conventional "S" on the right balances it perfectly. Ideal for your homepage branding.

Executive Order Analysis: “Transparency Regarding Foreign Influence At American Universities”

May 7, 2025

On April 23, 2025, President Donald J. Trump issued an Executive Order, “Transparency Regarding Foreign

A green stylized logo with the letters "K" and "S" combined within a green square. The "K," formed by abstract shapes, is to the left while the conventional "S" on the right balances it perfectly. Ideal for your homepage branding.

States Secure Order Restoring Federal Education Funding

May 7, 2025

On May 6, 2025, Judge Edgardo Ramos of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

Footer

King Spry White Logo

Quick Link

About KingSpry Commitment to the Community Firm History Career Opportunities at KingSpry Directions

Practice Areas

Adoption / ART Law Affordable Housing Law Bankruptcy Law Business Law Education Law Employment Law Estate Planning / Administration Family Law
Investigations and Compliance Services Litigation Local Taxation and Assessment Municipal Law Public Finance Real Estate Law Special Education Law

Contact

phone

610-332-0390

email

contact@kingspry.com

location

1 West Broad Street. Suite 700 Bethlehem, PA 18018

Facebook Youtube LinkedIn

Pay My Bill (Retainer Only) Pay My Bill (All Other Invoices)

Copyright © 2025. King Spry. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy

Notifications